Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

ACC Tourney Begins with NCSU

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

2010_acc_bracket_medium

Clemson Tigers (21-9, 9-7) vs. N.C. State Wolfpack (17-14, 5-11)

When: Approx. 9:30 on Raycom

Kenpom: Clemson 17, NCSU 68, Kenpom predictor says a 7pt Clemson win.

RPI: Clemson 27, NCSU 103

Leading Scorers: All-ACC F Tracy Smith (17.0ppg, 7.7rpg), F Dennis Horner (11.8ppg, 4.8 rpg), Javier Gonzalez (10 ppg, 3.8 apg)

Statistically, NCSU is behind us in pretty much every defensive category, and their offense is similarly bad statistically. They have good players inside but on the outside they are not daunting.

Looking back at our first meeting, we thoroughly dominated the woofers in the 1st half 45-28. We shot like mad (60%) and Booker ate them up early….then Stitt went down, we lost all momentum, and NC State started raining shots all over us in the 2nd half (43.8%) when our offense became stagnant and our shots stopped falling (34%, 1/10 from 3). We were in serious jeopardy of losing it at the end. Booker and Grant also had a bad time inside in the 2nd half getting any rebounds. Neither team turned the ball over that much, 11 for each.

Julius Mays put up 17 against us, Howell 13 points and 12 boards, and Smith put up 16 with 9 boards.

This time around, the big thing may again be how well we do on the boards. We didn’t impress against Wake there, and NC State did very well against us the first time around, particularly in offensive rebounding.

Right now, the team seems more confident than last year heading into the ACC Tourney after blowing our shot at a 1st-rd Bye.

“We kind of stumbled into the tournament last year,” sophomore guard Tanner Smith said. “We went in losing a few more games than we wanted to.”

Clemson went 3-4 in its final seven regular-season games a year ago, including losses in three of its last four.

The last time Clemson finished with a 5-2 flourish – two seasons ago – the Tigers advanced to the ACC tournament title game before losing to top-ranked North Carolina 86-81.

“We did lose our last game (at Wake Forest), but we’ve been playing well,” Smith said. “Confidence-wise, there’s a big difference. Going in on a roll will be nice for us.”

Demontez Stitt feels similarly

“I think that’s one the best things about this team,” said junior point guard Demontez Stitt. “We really haven’t played Clemson basketball for 40 minutes a game this year. We still have something to look forward to. If we start to put the pieces together and come together more, we’re going to be a tough team.

“That’s the exciting thing about it. We haven’t played up to our full potential. We still have a chance to go to the NCAA and make a lot of progress in the ACC Tournament.”

Defense fuels the optimism. In the last eight games, the Tigers have held their opponents under 70 points four times, and both Wake and Virginia Tech scored exactly 70.

“I think the concern in terms of turning the page from last year (was), ‘How are we going to shoot it,’” Purnell said. “I said maybe we won’t shoot it as well but we’re a better defensive team. I believe defense wins. That’s our strength. Now if we shoot it (well) to boot, which I think we’re capable of doing, well we’ve demonstrated that time in and time out (if we do that) we’ve got a chance to get on a roll.”

I’ve always had trouble having confidence in this team, particularly since we tend to choke in the state of NC. I think we beat NC State though.

The Tigers Stumble into the ACC Tournament

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

It wasn’t supposed to happen like this.

Trevor Booker and the heralded freshman class were supposed to contend for an ACC crown right away. Booker’s senior leadership and the freshmen athleticism were going to usher in a new era for Clemson basketball.

As it stands, Clemson missed out on an opportunity for a 3rd seed and slipped to a 6th seed by virtue of losing at Wake and now have to play NCSU on Thursday night. They are the only team playing on Thursday with 20+ wins.The game is at 9pm. Should they defeat NCSU, they play FSU on Friday night at 9pm. Both games could go either way.

If the Tigers cannot regroup from the inconsistencies they demonstrated on Sunday, they will have an early exit. If they can take advantage of the neutral court site, where they have already had some success this season against UNC-Greensboro.

And as I said in November, hopefully, the UNCG game will help the Tigers prepare for the ACC tournament.

OP said this of the Tigers’ focus going into the ACC tournament,
“We don’t need to think about the ACC title, we don’t need to think about the NCAA first-round game or any of that stuff – we’ve got to get our focus squarely on N.C. State. If you win a couple, then you can change your mindset.”

Despite the bloodied eye, Trevor Booker was named to the All ACC 1st team.
I don’t feel the need to delve into his performance or lack thereof against Wake on Sunday. The refs clearly were letting them play down low. Booker needed to take advantage of this a little more.

I know he didn’t get any calls, just a bloody eye.

From @TBook35 A Busted Eye…but no foul

That pretty much sums up the ACC season ending game against Wake.

The awards have been announced and everyone’s favorite Terp is the ACC player of the year. And the Gary Williams is the Coach of the year. I can live with that, but that doesn’t mean I have to like it.

Here is an interactive 2010 ACC Men’s Basketball Tournament Bracket from The ACC:

Thoughts as Spring Practice Begins – 5 Questions

Monday, March 8th, 2010

“I’m real excited about getting onto the field and starting with this 2010 team,” he said. “We’ve answered a lot of questions this year. We’re at a different point with this team. We’ve been through the fire. It’s not new. We know how we want to practice, what we want to practice. Last year, we signed 12 [in the recruiting class]. We feel good about this class we’re bringing in here. Minimally, we should be better. We should be a smarter team, staff. That should show from day one.

“If we can do the job the right way, it will help us play at a high-level every week. It’s a focus area for us. We’re good enough. As we evaluate all of the film, we’re pretty pleased with all of the information. We’ve got to take a little bit more pride in our consistency. If we can do that, we can have a very good year.” (source)

Clemson started spring practice yesterday, and now comes the time when you hear of the offseason all-stars who get built up to superhuman levels and then come crashing down during the season. Last year it was Antoine McClain that got rave reviews from everyone, and then missed the most assignments of any starting lineman. Oh, and remember Rendrick Taylor, the Football King of Spring?

We’ve done our Positional Analyses (and the last one for the DL will come out this week), so I don’t see any reason to do a spring preview. I would just keep in mind that whatever news is reported, here or elsewhere, in the next few weeks should be taken with a grain of salt. It is still just practice and scrimmages, its not performance under pressure in Fall against Auburn or UNC. Some guys don’t practice worth a crap (Walker) and some light people up in practice so much that you’d think they are made of gold (Taylor).

This spring, we’ll be looking at a few question marks.

1. WR corps. Can the young guys catch yet? Can they run routes any better and get open when we don’t have Spiller and Palmer to catch the passes?

2 .Left Guard and the Tackle situation. Right now, David Smith is being moved to LG, but I don’t see how he beats Mason Cloy for it in August if he’s 100%. I think Norris should be moved to LG for Spring since he reps as a Guard already, but Brad disagrees. Technique things are the same for both positions so Smith can still learn at Guard, but I’d rather have him rep against the quicker Ends/LBs he’d see in Fall when he’s moved back to Tackle.

Now with Price repping at 2-RT, Walker will have no one to light a fire under him. With his reputation so far as a lax practice player, we might come out disappointed with Walker in a few weeks. Brandon Thomas will start repping at 2-LT as a redshirt freshman. Recall that the 2’s roll out as a unit in practice, so you cant tell Smith to rep at 1-LG and then 2-L/RT successively, so the depth chart is a bit misleading.

In reality, Smith would step in at either L or RT if Hairston or Walker went down. Putting in Price or Thomas shouldn’t cause you to have a meltdown.

3. I have a suspicion that Tajh Boyd will be built up so much by writers this Spring that he will be the favorite player on the team this fall by TardNetters, especially if he doesnt play. Everybody loves the backup, and you’ll hear people screaming for Boyd at the first sign of Parker struggling. Just remember, Parker has one year of reading NCAA defenses, and that experience counts. I also suspect you’ll see at least 10 articles about Parker’s baseball/football dilemma.

4. Linebackers. We need them to step up. They are talented, at least according to the recruiting sites, but none really has done anything yet. We’ll see a definite rotation this spring but I suspect if a few guys continue to put on some weight, then things will change in Fall and the post-spring chart will be meaningless. I would not be surprised to hear us sticking to more Nickel and running out Meeks as a pseudo-SAM backer like we did with DMac 2 years ago.

5. Corner. Most of you, myself included, think that Maxwell will have one spot locked down soon enough. He did admirably last year. The other though is up for grabs. It could be Brewer, it could be Sensabaugh, or maybe someone like Spencer Adams will get moved over with the speed he has, but I think/hope Gilchrist steps into it.

Year 2 of a defensive scheme reaps the most gains, especially a complex one like we run. If the defense is not well ahead of the offense this spring I would be concerned. Bowers needs to step up his game to make up for the loss of Sapp, but I’m excited by having both Safeties back and expect quite a bit of 2 High Shell coverage.

Swinney will seek a new commitment to excellence this year, says Greg Wallace. We’ll see.

How has Oliver Purnell turned the Tigers around?

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

A couple weeks ago, after a very disappointing loss to Virginia Tech, many people started to give up on our chances. I personally thought 7-9 was a likely finish to the ACC slate. Our half court sets were abysmal during our slide since the UNC game and shooting was terribly inconsistent. We knew going into this 3-game homestand that this was the most crucial point in the season: either we’d fall apart like other years, or put it together and make the NCAAs. Well, we got the 3 wins we desperately needed, but how?

To put it simply, we’ve shot better.

The half-court sets are not really better or more advanced these last couple weeks, we’re scoring our points off of the same in-out game on offense and off turnovers, just like we always have. The defense has definitely had its moments, and has been good on the whole, but I wouldn’t call it smothering.

Some stats to put it in perspective:

  • In 5 games prior to this homestand, Clemson shot 113/304 = 37%. The only good game out of that was the 50% shooting performance against Boston College, that we lost. For the 3 game homestand, Clemson shot 67/141 = 47.5%, and 44% against one of the ACC’s best defensive teams in FSU.
  • In 5 games prior to this homestand, Clemson shot over 70% from the FT line exactly 0 times, the best being a 9/13 (69%) performance against Duke. Since BC, where we were 50%, it has consistently risen in every game. During this homestand, we shot over 75% in every game, 66/82 = 80.5%.
  • Since ACC play started, Clemson has not shot better than 40% from the 3 point line.  We have not shot over 30% from the arc but twice, Game 1 vs BC (35.7%), and NC State (40%). In each game of this homestand, Clemson has shot 35% or better in every game and 23/58 = 39.6% for the 3 games.
  • No defensive statistic shows this drastic a change over the homestand. We aren’t defending percentagewise any differently, and other than UVA today (2/13) we actually did a worse job at defending the 3. We didn’t force that many turnovers (15, 14, 12) though we did get 11 steals against FSU. Our own turnovers don’t show a noticeable trend over the last 8 games.
  • Other than a day off 2-pt performance against FSU, Jerai Grant has really stepped up his production on offense since the Boston College loss. He put up over 10 points just 5 times until BC, but has had 5 games over 11 points since, 2 double-doubles and nearly a 3rd after having just 1 all season. He’s finally turned into the offensive threat at the 5-spot that we needed to take some pressure off Booker going forward, averaging 12.3ppg over his last 6.

But why? Well Andre Young has certainly picked up his game since Stitt’s injury. His assists have gone way up along with his production. Demontez Stitt has come back to full health slowly, and until today’s blowout his minutes have been going upwards. David Potter had been trending upwards until Miami, where he again fell off the map offensively (3/13). Trevor Booker’s stats haven’t shown a real trend either, he actually got close to 20ppg from the first Duke game until Maryland, and since the flu he’s been down offensively in part because his minutes have been lower. Over the 3 game set he put up 13, 18, and 14 points in 25 minutes today.

So it’s really not just one player that’s carrying us, we’ve just shot better as a team and hit those much-needed baskets and layups in transition and off the steals we have gotten. Its been different guys to step up in each game.

Clemson throttles UVA 72-49 to move to 7-5 in the ACC

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

The Tigers moved to 3-0 with their resounding 72-49 win yesterday against UVA. They were able to successfully hold home court in that critical three game stretch to move to 7-5 in the ACC.

UVA is in a swoon as they played four games in the same amount of time the Tigers played two, including yesterday’s game. Landesberg was held in check by the defense and the Tiger defense was allowed to play, despite the lead official of the game being Karl Hess. Maybe if the Hess curse can be broken, then maybe the Chapel Hill curse can be as well. This is definitely a season the Tigers can lament the ACC scheduling imbalance, as the Tigers will not be playing in Chapel Hill this year.

Two of the most important developments of the past three games has been the maturation and play of Jerai Grant and the improved play of Milton Jennings. Jerai Grant played solidly against UVA, going 8-9 for 18pts. While he was in foul trouble against the tall trees of FSU, he had 13 pts in the win against Miami. If he is playing strong down low, more space is created for Trevor Booker. And when the outside shots are falling, the Tigers look and play like an actual, real-life top 25 basketball team.

Now, if Milton Jennings keeps his confidence up for the remainder of the year, the Tigers will be a much different team than the one who lost to BC, Duke x2, GT, VT, and even Texas A&M and Illinois. Milton Jennings had easily his best performance of the year against UVA going 4-4 with 11pts. He has been playing assignment basketball, focusing on rebounds  and defense. Should he continue to match his offensive effort with his defensive efforts, many of the Jennings naysayers and schadenfreude revelers will have their comeuppance, and more importantly, Clemson basketball will be in a better place. Yes, that is a lot of hypotheticals.

Up next  the Tigers have to maintain their current level of play in two upcoming road games. The Tigers play another road-weary team in Maryland. The Terps are coming off an emotional, last second, two last shot, win vs. GT. Remember Grievous Vasquez and his Stitt comment? Here’s what Booker had to say:

“They didn’t think Stitt being out was a factor,” Booker said of the Maryland team. “(Grievous) Vazquez said something in the newspaper about, ‘Who’s Stitt?’ or something like that.“When we get up there,”  “he’ll find out who Demontez Stitt is.”

On Wednesday, it will be time for the Tigers to let the Stitt out against MD.

Stay up late and watch the game on Raycom Wednesday, 2/24/2010, at 9:00pm.

To read more about Clemson Basketball, check out The OP Blog.

Go Tigers!

February Thoughts on Clemson Athletics

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

Here are some random thoughts and opinions about a variety of issues that we will continue to investigate over at www.shakinthesouthland.com:

Clemson signed an acceptable class this season.  We overviewed this class at STS here:  http://www.shakinthesouthland.com/2010/2/3/1289865/the-2010-clemson-tiger-recruiting and will evaluate how the Tigers class looks on a needs-fill basis this week (week starting Feb 8).  Bringing in Justin Parker was critical for this class.  It was also nice to see the set of skills players (DB’s and WR’s) that we brought in this season.  Clemson has a lot of work to do for the ‘11 class based on needs and losses after this year, but should be (overall) happy about this group.

Clemson basketball has placed itself in a bad situation moving forward.  With a loss at Virginia Tech, Clemson fell to 4-5 in conference play.  Clemson has played extremely poor fundamental basketball, especially in half court sets.  Further, the Tigers do a poor job of moving without the ball and implementing anything complex.  Clemson cannot convert free throws and is really poor shooting from the field.  If the Tigers’ full court press does not result in easy transition points, the Tigers are in real trouble each and every night.  This team has a lot of basic issues that need correcting.

Moving forward, Clemson is really spiraling and has to win a minimum 3 of their next 4 to legitimately position themselves for any decent NCAA birth.  The Tigers have three consecutive road games before traveling to College Park.  CU still has hope but needs to do a lot of things to become more relevant.

On the basketball note, I have been particularly disappointed with the television coverage/availability for the country’s premier conference.  Living in SC, I would expect that I would be able to watch Clemson play on Saturdays.  Unfortunately, no one in my viewing area carries ACC basketball on Raycom.  I expect Swofford to address this issue.  ACC basketball is a huge conference asset.  To handicap this conference by lack of a distribution network is comical.  Raycom provides excellent basketball coverage.  It is almost criminal that Swoffy and the boys cannot work out a better plan to get ACC teams more coverage (especially in bball season).   Current Raycom announcers are well versed in this conference’s history and teams and I personally believe that viewers nationwide would be interested in seeing some of the country’s best basketball coupled with excellent coverage.

The folks in the SEC are reaping the benefits of media deals, I would expect the ACC to follow suit within the year.  If not, the schools should demand the ACC leadership completely removed and replaced with a group that wants the ACC (and schools outside the research triangle) to get some benefit from participating in this league.

Basketball Q&A with VT blog Gobbler Country

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

I would like to thank the folks over at Gobbler Country for participating in a Question/Answer session in anticipation with our game this Saturday.  Please feel free to visit their site for all new V Tech info including bball and football articles as well as our responses to their questions.

STS Question: You mention on your site that a 0.500 record will not get Va Tech into the NCAA tourney.  What record will get them there?  What would a win over Clemson do to boost these chances?

GC Answer: It’s beginning to look more and more like a 10-6 conference record is a must for the Hokies. The ACC as a whole has proved to be very balanced across the board, but with no real powerful teams. Virtually every team Tech faced in the non-conference slate has a losing record, and most of those teams are at the bottom of their conference standings. Winning at home against Clemson will be very important for their tournament hopes. Coach Greenberg constantly stresses the importance of winning all of your home games, because road wins are hard to come by in this conference. A loss on Saturday would put the Hokies’ backs against the wall heading into the second half of the conference season.



STS Question: Malcolm Delaney is averaging almost 20 points a game for the Hokies.  What will Clemson need to do to keep Delaney at bay?  Can Virginia Tech win if Delaney can be stopped, or do you suspect another Hokie will be able to step up here?

GC Answer: Clemson’s full-court pressure will be a tough matchup for the Hokies, because Delaney will have to be the primary ball-handler. That could wear him down quicker than coach Greenberg would. When Delaney sat out the game in Cancun against Seton Hall with a sprained ankle, Dorenzo Hudson erupted for 41 points. That will never happen again, but Tech has proved they can compete even if Delaney is missing from the lineup entirely. That being said, Clemson is another animal compared to Seton Hall.



STS Question: VT handled UVa a few weeks ago, giving the Hokies a quality January win.  You then followed with a loss to Miami.  Which team should we expect to see Saturday?

GC Answer: As was said earlier, winning on the road in the ACC is extremely difficult to do, no matter who you are. The win over Virginia was draining for a few reasons: it involved two double-digit comebacks, a game-tying buzzer-beater by Virginia, and of course an overtime period. The team went straight from Charlottesville to Miami, and they came out very sluggish in the early going against the Hurricanes. It was a taxing road trip to say the least. The Hokies are 9-0 (maybe 9-1 or 10-0 depending on UNC outcome) at home this season, so I expect a strong showing on Saturday.



STS Question: VT will be coming off a game on Thursday against UNC.  Do you expect fatigue to play a factor for the Hokies against Clemson?  If necessary, how deep can this team get into the bench and still get quality production?

GC Answer: Because both games are at home, and there is no traveling involved, fatigue should not set in for this team. Greenberg has done an excellent job playing 10 and 11 guys in every game, so that they are ready if called upon in important moments. Realistically, there are five players off the bench that Greenberg would be comfortable putting in a game as important as this one. J.T. Thompson, Erick Green, Ben Boggs, Manny Atkins and Cadarian Raines will all play a decent number of minutes. Raines, a promising 6’9’’ freshman, will have to be used to defend Trevor Booker if Victor Davila and Jeff Allen are both out of the game.



STS Question: Which unexpected player should Clemson fans be watching for Saturday?  Also, is there some player on the roster who gives extreme effort and plays better than his raw talent?

GC Answer: J.T. Thompson has emerged over the last few games as the proverbial “starter off the bench”. His numbers would indicate he is a starter (6.6 ppg, 4 rpg), and his 17-point performance against Virginia tied a season-high. He followed that up with 14 points at Miami. He has great length for a forward, but will face a tough test if he has to defend the physical Booker inside.



STS Question: Overall, where does this VT team stand when compared to the rest of the ACC?

GC Answer: It’s hard to tell, honestly. Nobody in the ACC is bad, but nobody is great, even Duke. The Hokies have the worst field-goal percentage in the league, but have one of the best scoring defenses. They remind me of Florida State from a year ago. Malcolm Delaney carries the team, just like Toney Douglass did, while the supporting cast is full of long athletic players who play lock-down half-court defense. The biggest problem is if Delaney is ineffective, there is not another proven scorer that you can count on to pick up the slack. I would peg the Hokies as the fifth or sixth-best team in the league, but with the ridiculous parity in the league this year, does that really mean anything? The ACC tournament will be as important as I can remember it ever being in determining who goes to the big dance and who doesn’t.

Clemson Welcomes Duke to Tigertown

Friday, January 22nd, 2010
Necessary items for winning basketball games

Necessary items for winning basketball games

Right now, the Tigers are in a precarious situation.

Their performance of late has been less than consistent. At best, the Tigers are a Sweet 16 team; at worst, they don’t even make the tournament. They are a team with two distinct parts of their personality:

  1. They play aggressive hard-nosed defense. They feed the ball through T. Booker,  Stitt  slashes and passes, and another player rises to the occasion as necessary.
  2. They have short-term memory loss. They build big leads quickly and let off the gas. They do not follow through with their course of action

This is what I wrote on Deadspin before last year’s NCAA tournament:

2) Stay Hard Clemson Each of the past four years, the Tigers have started out hard. Each of the
past four years, the Tigers have finished soft. Incidentally, the 1996-1997 team did as well.

2006: First Half of season: 11-0, second half: 8-13, final record, 19-13
2007: First Half of season: 17-0 second half: 8- 11, final record: 25-11
2008: First Half of season: 10-0, second half: 14-10, final record: 24-10
2009: First Half of season: 16-0, second half: 7-8, current record: 23-8

These strong starts have been a knock against Clemson Basketball from both fans and national media. Still, as a charter member of the ACC, and a self-proclaimed “football school,” just being discussed in the context of basketball is nice. We’ll see if Oliver Purnell can get his first NCAA win and help the Tigers seal the deal this year.

The same general idea holds true now. While we are not involved in a gaudy winning streak. We are involved in a series of in-game collapses, or near collapses- see Illinois and NC State games.

With Duke coming to town this weekend, the Tigers must not get wrapped up in the national attention this game will be receiving, but rather play their game.

Duke is not invincible. They lost to NCSU, who the Tigers just beat, though just barely, last week. They keep their focus tight and clear. It is up to the Tigers to prevent the Blue Devils from playing the anticipatory Duke brand of basketball. They block passing lanes, they move well without the ball, and do the small things that most other teams do not. Their big three: Scheyer, Singler, and Smith now have a capable supporting cast.

Clemson has to feed Trevor Booker. They have to have a big game from Stitt.  Someone else from either the starting lineup- Grant, Potter, or Smith needs to play well and one player- or any combination of players- from the bench needs to step up.

The loss to GT was tough, but it proved that the Tigers can be resilient. This resilience will be necessary to avoid a mini-collapse as the ACC progresses.

The next group of games after this much-hyped match up with Duke could be dangerous for the Tigers if they are focusing on anything else but the game at hand.

For more Clemson basketball news and info, check out The OP blog or follow me on twitter.

Clemson review through 5 games

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

With Clemson 5 games into the ACC schedule and coming up on a big game against Duke Saturday, I wanted to look at where the Tigers are and where they need to go to achieve our goal of 10 ACC wins this season. So far the Tigers have been about average, scoring wins over Boston College, NC State, and UNC yet getting drilled by Duke and dropping a close one at Georgia Tech.

Clemson’s play has been up and down to this point, hitting on all cylinders against an overrated UNC team, scoring a mere 12 points in a half against Duke, giving up a huge second half lead against the Wolfpack, and not being able to convert on opportunities in the GT game. All in all, I think Clemson has some issues that they will need to iron out but still think double digit wins in-conference are attainable.

Clemson has been about who we thought they were…a team that is essentially propped up by its best player, Trevor Booker. Clemson has gotten some quality production out of the PG, Demontez Stitt, and out of scrappy Tanner Smith. While freshmen Noel Johnson, Devin Booker, and Milton Jennings won’t leave for The League after this year, they have been utilized this season and appear to be improving as the season progresses, though not as quickly as we all would like. Andre Young has been able to step in and give Clemson some quality minutes and gives Oliver Purnell some flexibility with Stitt if needed.

The Tigers have struggled in their usual areas (free throws) as well as in the spots we were concerned about entering the year–particularly perimeter shooting. I really cannot explain our inability to shoot free throws at times (Ga Tech sticks out) and really cannot point a finger at a Clemson team in recent memory that has been decent at the stripe game in and game out.

Clemson has also looked lackadaisical at times on both ends of the court. I would like to see Trevor Booker and the boys get more aggressive under the boards and on the defensive end overall, as this team has a tendency of taking some defensive possessions off. Clemson at times has been able to utilize pressure (full court) to create scenarios favorable to the Tigers.

Offensively, Clemson can be frustrating to watch. Too frequently you look up and see a bunch of guys in orange shirts standing around with one person dribbling. Shot selection has also frustrated me at times, as I think that Clemson forces bad shots and often does not try hard enough to get the ball inside when we are shooting poorly from outside.

CU’s offense goes through one man, Trevor Booker. Booker averages 15.6 PPG and has scored as needed this season. Stitt has picked up some of the slack offensively and averages double figures on the season. Tanner Smith plays extremely hard all game long, and has been able to help Clemson so far with points on the floor and from the charity stripe (particularly at NC State). Like we have said all year, Tanner may not be the most talented player on the court but will bust his tail all game long and does everything that he can to help the Tigers become successful on the court. Andre Young rounds out the other most reliable player that the Tigers have on this squad. Young is a talented player who sometimes lacks confidence in his game, it appears. He has the ability to get hot from downtown, which is something the Tigers will need to be a factor down deep into February.

There is a significant drop-off in production after Young. We were hoping that Noel Johnson and Milton Jennings would be able to contribute significantly after coming into school with such high praise. I was particularly wanting to see Noel Johnson establish a confident stroke outside to take some pressure off of T. Booker down low, which unfortunately has not (consistently) happened this season. Jerai Grant has not been a consistent threat and David Potter has been pretty much worthless to this point.

So, where are we at as a squad? Duke pretty much took the Tigers to the woodshed, throttling us from the opening tip. Clemson was able to bounce back against Boston College then killed North Carolina in a down year for the Tigers. These results (well, probably not the absolute kill shot taken to Duke then given to UNC) did not really surprise me nor concern me too much, as Cameron Indoor is a tough place to play and UNC is retooling from their great run last season and Clemson hosted the Heels at Littlejohn.

The games against NC State and Georgia Tech were troubling for me as a fan. The NC State game was one where Clemson had a chance to go for the jugular and could not put away the Pack despite a huge lead. I really thought that Clemson learned from the Illinois game (but will concede that losing Stitt played a bigger factor than I will give credit to). Instead, Clemson let up again and almost was the victim of another ridiculous comeback. The Georgia Tech game was another one that makes you scratch your head. Clemson was extremely sloppy throughout and shot a mere 37% from the floor. Worse than the 37% effort was Clemson’s 50% effort from the line. This is pitiful and will not win many ACC basketball games.

Where do we need to go? This team is at 3-2 right now, not exactly down and out but CU could/should have won Tuesday night against the Jackets. Obviously, we need some consistent perimeter shooting. While the Tigers did this well in the first half of the North Carolina game, we have not been able to effectively take as much pressure off of Trevor Booker as I would like. Side note to Trevor–where is the beast we have grown to love over the past few years? I know the NBA is exciting, but we miss the monster and specifically the shear aggression seen before.

I think Clemson as a team lacks an overall killer instinct as shown in the Illinois and NCST games. Clemson showed that they can battle back (Ga Tech) but need to learn how to finish. This team has to learn how to make free throws. Watching Clemson make a mere half their chances from the stripe against Tech made me want to puke. You cannot win basketball games in the ACC without taking advantage of easy scoring opportunities, and free throws definitely fit into that category.

We are hoping that Stitt will be able to recover fully from the injury he suffered at NC State, as he has been a pleasant surprise for me this season providing an outside shot and creating opportunities off of dribble penetration. Clemson will need more attempts from Andre Young as we move forward. Young has been able to convert a fair amount of looks, shooting 44% from three point land in ACC play. We will need to see more out of Noel Johnson and his touted perimeter touch.

As posted earlier, the Clemson defensive effort improves dramatically when we are able to score points due to the Tigers’ ability to implement their full court pressure. In half-court sets, CU does not appear as aggressive at times as it has in previous years. I would really like to see the Tigers get after it a little better on the glass to avoid giving opponents multiple looks at the basket on a single possession. So far, Clemson has been out-rebounded by Duke, North Carolina, NC State, and Georgia Tech and will need to win more of these battles in the future.

visit with us at www.shakinthesouthland.com

Requiescat in Pace, Gaines Adams

Sunday, January 17th, 2010

290169267_31074f2768_medium

Anima eius et animae omnium fidelium defunctorum per Dei misericordiam requiescant in pace

This morning we were struck by news that shakes all Tiger fans to the core: one of our own has died.

Gaines Adams signed with Clemson in 2002, coming from Fork Union Prep in Virginia. His High School, Cambridge Academy, played 8-man football and he got little interest at that time. His coach, Steve Taneyhill, tried to get people to notice him to no avail, despite winning the state championship. Taneyhill called USC, and they declined. He then called Tommy Bowden. He wasn’t able to sign out of Cambridge and went to Fork Union. During his season at Fork Union, he finally got the nation’s attention for his former star player.

At Fork Union, he lit up scoreboards as a TE and terrorized QBs with 22 sacks as a DE. He was committed to UNC for a short time, but John Bunting could not hold onto him and he committed to Clemson in 2002. He was a tall lanky kid who had to put on weight to play, so he redshirted in 2002. My first recollection of him is watching him fly into the Florida State backfield in 2003 as a freshman, sacking Chris Rix; his speed off the edge was so phenomenal that he ran right by some of the best left tackles in the conference even then. He broke up a pass against Tennessee in the Peach Bowl and played nearly half of that game and he gave the Vols fits off the edge.

But 2005 was his breakout season. Finally named a starter, he registered 9.5 sacks and 56 tackles. The team strung together wins and Gaines was unstoppable in each of them. He again ripped apart the Seminoles’ offensive tackles. The game against Colorado in the Champs/Tangerine Bowl reminded me much of how the defense ate up Major Harris in the Gator Bowl, and Gaines Adams led the way. After the year, he called Steve Taneyhill and asked him if he should go pro. Taneyhill asked him what he wanted to do after football, to which Gaines replied, “I want to coach with you”. Steve said he’d need that degree and that the pros can wait til next year, so Gaines stayed for his last year.

In 2006 he removed the stigma that had been over his head previously, namely that he “took plays off” and was stellar all year, even as the team collapsed down the stretch. One play saved the Tigers from an embarrassing loss to Wake Forest. On a cool dreary day the Tigers looked lethargic and got themselves down 17-3 at the start of the 4th quarter, and Gaines picked up a fumbled FG attempt and ran it back for a TD that ignited the team to a 27-17 win and we rode a wave that continued through the night game against Georgia Tech. Gaines capped it off by being the 4th pick in the draft by the Tampa Bay Bucs.

It never mattered that Gaines didnt play for my team, I pulled for him anyway. He is a Clemson boy, Clemson is family, and we are Tigers for life.

But this morning Gaines was taken from us. We don’t know why, but God has a plan and now Gaines is home. As bad as we feel for ourselves and his family, we should rejoice for him, because now he’s with Our Father in a place where no shadows fall.

“I remember his smile. He never complained about how long practice was, how much hitting we were going to do. He always had that smile on his face.” – Tommy Bowden

Where the Blue Ridge yawns its greatness;
Where the Tigers play;
Here the sons of dear Old Clemson,
Reign supreme always.

Dear Old Clemson, we will triumph
And with all our might
That the Tiger’s roar may echo
O’er the mountain height.

Your roar will not be forgotten Gaines. You now have the ultimate triumph in His presence.